Sunday, 1 September 2013

TWC Session 2

Interesting topics were covered this week. We started with defining the difference between innovation and invention. My conclusion at the end of the discussion was innovation was essentially creation, generation of ideas and invention was the physical manifestation of the idea. Hence, as agreed in class: Invention was the subset of innovation. Then we moved on to history of the world. How different societies once dominated the world at different point in time and their subsequent downfall.

One area in particular that caught my interest was Prof's Organizational Behavioral Model which can be applied to areas like the rise and fall of nations and corporations. Prominent examples such as the fall of China and India and the subsequent rise of European nations have been brought up, as it had been the previous lesson. But this time, the model was also applied to corporations, where once industry leaders like IBM and Microsoft have dominated their market have fallen from grace and are gradually replaced by newcomers like Apple and China's Huawei.

I am convinced that this model is extremely useful in explaining in retrospect but extremely difficult to apply in the present. Take Microsoft for example. Microsoft was once the Apple and Google of today. A place where programmers and managers worked towards excellence instead of bottom-line. They saw IBM as the hulking tech giant that was bore down by politics and bureaucracies. Innovation was replaced by internal office politics where potentially revolutionary technologies like the e-book and smartphone technologies was suppressed and even sabotaged by colleagues who were under the impression that they would not only be rewarded for excellence but the failure of their peers as well. It was once cool to work in Microsoft. But over the years, they themselves became IBM, the very thing they despised.

My point here is: Microsoft saw and knew what led to the downfall of IBM and yet they knowingly, and perhaps even willingly followed, their steps. I see the same pattern with Apple nowadays, a once innovative company which came up with revolutionary products such as the iPod, iPhone, iOS have seen far fallen from grace after one of the most spectacular revivals in corporate histories. Many are speculating the end of Apple's innovative streak. Which is kind of true if you look at their recent performance, iPhone 5's sales are staggering behind Samsung's S series smartphones. Its once revolutionary iOS has been losing market share to the Android OS. The Macintosh is still a niche among many users. And investors seems to agree, Apple shares have fallen almost 30% since its peak in 2012. What happened? It was once cool to work in Apple (still is). But over the years, they are slowly becoming Microsoft, the very thing they despised.

The question now becomes: Is the downfall of innovative companies, once they become too big, inevitable? I guess we'll have to look to Google to know that answer.

We then went on to discuss the reading “The Colonial Holocaust and its Legacy”. How wonderful things such as religion, education, civility became excuses for conquest, slavery, genocide. When I read the article, I wept. I simply could not fathom how humanity is capable of such cruelty to members of their own race. How people can glorify a purge and genocide of an entire race with holiday and roast turkey. How we can bear to see a once proud, culturally advanced and innately gentle race be reduced to savages and casinos at the mention of Cherokee. Then I remembered: We are the only race on Earth that would kill each other not for food or territory or self-defense but because we can.

HDI was very interesting.


I would rate this session an 8/10. A broad range of topics were covered that were relevant to our future use. The analysis of the past, present and future gave us an idea on how thing were, how they are now and where they are going.

Monday, 19 August 2013

TWC Session 1

Even though it's the first TWC lesson and the class spent half the time introducing themselves, we still managed to touch on some interesting topics. From the very beginning of the session, we defined technology. What is technology? Technology is the practical application of knowledge, it consists of almost every field imaginable. Ranging from engineering to education, from the Large Hadron Collider to the simple wheel. Its advance is only bounded by human ingenuity. Then the discussion went on to the readings that most of the class didn't read or didn't dare discuss since most of the class didn't read. But still, despite that we covered some interesting ideas.

One such is the relationship between society's receptivity to foreign cultures, ideas, knowledge to its prosperity or decline. We've seen examples of some of the most technologically advance and powerful nations of their times decline and brought to down to their knees by their less advanced counterparts. Why? It is argued that being secluded, isolated from other cultures hinders technological advancements and such environment itself stifles scientific discovery as their societies become less receptive towards new ideas and more hostile towards foreign cultures. Although there might be other reasons for a nation's stagnation. I've read a book called Why Nations Fail and the author argues that scientific stagnancy might not wholly be due to society's fear of change or unreceptive to scientific advancement but rather the political institute's fear of technology tipping the balance of power in society, and thus intentionally and actively cracking down on technological advances and its proponents. One famous example would be the imprisonment of Galileo Galilei by the Catholic Church.

Another interesting point raised was the use of technology. It is only as good or as evil as the hand wielding it. Scientific discovery brought us the computers, internet, airplanes and ability walking on the moon, limitless, clean nuclear energy and marvelous things that we only could dream of mere decades ago. Technology has made our lives easier, more productive and more enjoyable than our ancestors. One could argue that technological advancement is good for society but I think that while there are tremendous benefits, great technological advancements have always been followed by great violence and vice versa. Computer was originally designed to crack Axis codes during WWII. The internet was originally funded by America's DOD and was clearly ear-marked for peaceful non-violent purposes. One of the first applications of airplanes was not meant for transportation of people but bombs. The greatest leap in aeronautics technology was during a standoff between two of the most powerful nations the world has ever seen. And then there is the atomic bomb. History have shown us that we have exploited technology at every turn. Every time we take two steps forward, we trip over ourselves and stumble a step back. Humans, while having incredible potential, are clearly not the nicest bunch.

Overall I have enjoyed my first TWC session. Hopefully from future sessions I would not only like to discover how technology changed the world but also how and more importantly why do such advancements occur. I give the first session 7/10.